File(s) not publicly available
Workers' compensation : one more step for federalism?
In March 2007 the High Court handed down its decision in Attorney-General for the State of Victoria v Andrews [2007] HCA 9. The decision permitted Optus to opt out of the Victorian Workers’ Compensation scheme and gain national workers’ compensation coverage under the Commonwealth’s scheme. In reasoning reflective of the Workchoices decision (New South Wales v Commonwealth [2006] 81 ALJR 34; 231 ALR 1) the majority of the High Court was of the opinion that ability to offer insurance for workers’ compensation was not within the exclusive jurisdiction of the states. That a state-based employer is now able to insure on a national basis represents one more step for federalism at the expense of the states.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
28Issue
4Start Page
186End Page
192Number of Pages
7ISSN
0312-1658Location
Pyrmont, NSWPublisher
Lawbook CoLanguage
en-ausPeer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
External Author Affiliations
Faculty of Business and Informatics; Not affiliated to a Research Institute;Era Eligible
- Yes