File(s) stored somewhere else
Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on CQUniversity and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.
Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review
journal contributionposted on 25.05.2021, 00:27 authored by Amy-Louise ByrneAmy-Louise Byrne, Adele BaldwinAdele Baldwin, Clare HarveyClare Harvey
Aim The aims of this literature review were to better understand the current literature about person-centred care (PCC) and identify a clear definition of the term PCC relevant to nursing practice. Method/Data sources An integrative literature review was undertaken using The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Scopus and Pubmed databases. The limitations were English language, full text articles published between 1998 and 2018 within Australian, New Zealand, Canada, USA, Europe, Ireland and UK were included. The international context off PCC is then specifically related to the Australian context. Review methods The review adopted a thematic analysis to categorise and summarise themes with reference to the concept of PCC. The review process also adhered to the Preferred Reporting System for Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools to ensure the quality of the papers included for deeper analysis. Results While definitions of PCC do exist, there is no universally used definition within the nursing profession. This review has found three core themes which contribute to how PCC is understood and practiced, these are People, Practice and Power. This review uncovered a malalignment between the concept of PCC and the operationalisation of the term; this misalignment was discovered at both the practice level, and at the micro, meso and micro levels of the healthcare service. Conclusion The concept of PCC is well known to nurses, yet ill-defined and operationalised into practice. PCC is potentially hindered by its apparent rhetorical nature, and further investigation of how PCC is valued and operationalised through its measurement and reported outcomes is needed. Investigation of the literature found many definitions of PCC, but no one universally accepted and used definition. Subsequently, PCC remains conceptional in nature, leading to disparity between how it is interpreted and operationalised within the healthcare system and within nursing services.
Number of Pages21
PublisherPublic Library of Science
Publisher LicenseCC BY
Additional RightsCC BY 4.0
Person-Centred Care (PCC)Preferred Reporting System for Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)e Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)NursingNursing servicesHealthcare systemPatientsHealthcare policyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansNurse-Patient RelationsNursesPatient-Centered CareGeneral Science & TechnologyHealth and Community ServicesNursing not elsewhere classified