CQUniversity
Browse

What was the impact of a participatory research project in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare services Applying a comprehensive framework for assessing translational health research to Lessons for the Best

journal contribution
posted on 2021-07-14, 22:14 authored by Shanthi A Ramanathan, Sarah Larkins, Karen Carlisle, Nalita Turner, Ross S Bailie, Sandra Thompson, Roxanne Bainbridge, Simon Deeming, Andrew Searles
Objectives To (1) apply the Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) to Lessons from the Best to Better the Rest (LFTB), (2) report on impacts from LFTB and (3) assess the feasibility and outcomes from a retrospective application of FAIT. Setting Three Indigenous primary healthcare (PHC) centres in the Northern Territory, Australia; project coordinating centre distributed between Townsville, Darwin and Cairns and the broader LFTB learning community across Australia. Participants LFTB research team and one representative from each PHC centre. Primary and secondary outcome measures Impact reported as (1) quantitative metrics within domains of benefit using a modified Payback Framework, (2) a cost-consequence analysis given a return on investment was not appropriate and (3) a narrative incorporating qualitative evidence of impact. Data were gathered through in-depth stakeholder interviews and a review of project documentation, outputs and relevant websites. Results LFTB contributed to knowledge advancement in Indigenous PHC service delivery; enhanced existing capacity of health centre staff, researchers and health service users; enhanced supportive networks for quality improvement; and used a strengths-based approach highly valued by health centres. LFTB also leveraged between A1.4 and A1.6 million for the subsequent Leveraging Effective Ambulatory Practice (LEAP) Project to apply LFTB learnings to resource development and creation of a learning community to empower striving PHC centres. Conclusion Retrospective application of FAIT to LFTB, although not ideal, was feasible. Prospective application would have allowed Indigenous community perspectives to be included. Greater appreciation of the full benefit of LFTB including a measure of return on investment will be possible when LEAP is complete. Future assessments of impact need to account for the limitations of fully capturing impact when intermediate/final impacts have not yet been realised and captured.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

11

Issue

2

Start Page

1

End Page

12

Number of Pages

12

eISSN

2044-6055

ISSN

2044-6055

Location

England

Publisher

BioMed Central

Publisher License

CC BY-NC

Additional Rights

CC BY-NC

Language

eng

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

Cultural Warning

This research output may contain the names and images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people now deceased. We apologize for any distress that may occur.

Acceptance Date

2021-02-10

External Author Affiliations

University Centre for Rural Health, NSW; James Cook University; University of Newcastle; Health Research Economics, Hunter Medical Research Institute

Author Research Institute

  • Centre for Indigenous Health Equity Research

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Medium

Electronic

Journal

BMJ Open

Article Number

e040749