CQUniversity
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

What conservative interventions improve bite function in those with temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review using self-reported and physical measures

journal contribution
posted on 2022-10-26, 02:05 authored by Alana Dinsdale, B Costin, S Dharamdasani, R Page, N Purs, J Treleaven
Background: Bite is an important function of the human stomatognathic system. Despite this, it is commonly impaired in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) populations. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of conservative interventions on self-reported and physical measures of bite function in individuals with TMD. Methods: This review was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was performed on databases including PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane Central. Inclusion criteria were journal articles evaluating the effect of any non-pharmacological conservative interventions on bite function in participants diagnosed with TMD. Risk of bias for individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias v2 tool, and the NIH NHLBI pre-post tool. Data was synthesised based on outcome measures of bite function, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results: Eleven studies were eligible for this review. Interventions included splinting, photobiomodulation, needling, exercise, manual therapy, and patient education, which were evaluated using mastication-related pain, self-reported chewing difficulty, and bite force/endurance outcome measures. Findings suggested manual therapy, needling, oral splinting, exercise, and PBM interventions may improve bite function in TMD, although confidence in cumulative evidence ranged from moderate to very low. There was no evidence that patient education improved bite function. Conclusion: Conservative interventions may be helpful to address bite-related impairments associated with TMD, although further research is needed to improve the quality of evidence and direct clinical guidelines.

History

Volume

49

Issue

4

Start Page

456

End Page

475

Number of Pages

20

eISSN

1365-2842

ISSN

0305-182X

Publisher

Wiley

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2022-01-17

External Author Affiliations

University of Queensland

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Medium

Print-Electronic

Journal

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC