CQUniversity
Browse

Using risk and odds ratios to assess effect size for meta-analysis outcome measures

Version 2 2021-09-02, 00:28
Version 1 2021-09-01, 23:47
journal contribution
posted on 2021-09-02, 00:28 authored by Mousa Alavi, Glenn E Hunt, Denis C Visentin, Roger Watson, Deependra K Thapa, Michelle L Cleary
Best practice is built on the principle of aggregating all available evidence on a topic to make a clinical decision on the most appropriate intervention for the situation at hand. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are powerful tools that summarize the evidence for current best practice guidelines for the available interventions for a particular problem (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009). Meta-analysis combines the results of multiple studies to produce an aggregated and more precise estimates of the benefits of the interventions. Meta-analysis of high-quality randomized trials is considered the highest level of evidence to inform practice.

History

Volume

76

Issue

12

Start Page

3231

End Page

3234

Number of Pages

4

eISSN

1365-2648

ISSN

0309-2402

Location

England

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Language

eng

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2020-08-19

External Author Affiliations

University of Hull, UK; The University of Sydney; Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran; University of Tasmania

Era Eligible

  • No

Medium

Print-Electronic

Journal

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC