DOCUMENT
cqu_13956+bin21fe455c-990e-4a55-9946-5fccdac41d2f+bin21fe455c-990e-4a55-9946-5fccdac41d2f.0.pdf (131.64 kB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_13956+bin21fe455c-990e-4a55-9946-5fccdac41d2f+bin21fe455c-990e-4a55-9946-5fccdac41d2f.1.pdf (131.64 kB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_13956+bin21fe455c-990e-4a55-9946-5fccdac41d2f+bin21fe455c-990e-4a55-9946-5fccdac41d2f.2.pdf (131.64 kB)
1/0
Unpacking the public stigma of problem gambling: The process of stigma creation and predictors of social distancing
journal contribution
posted on 2017-12-20, 00:00 authored by Nerilee HingNerilee Hing, Alexander RussellAlexander Russell, SM GainsburyBackground and aims: Public stigma diminishes the health of stigmatized populations, so it is critical to understand how and why stigma occurs to inform stigma reduction measures. This study aimed to examine stigmatizing attitudes held toward people experiencing problem gambling, to examine whether specific elements co-occur to create this public stigma, and to model explanatory variables of this public stigma. Methods: An online panel of adults from Victoria, Australia (N = 2,000) was surveyed. Measures were based on a vignette for problem gambling and included demographics, gambling behavior, perceived dimensions of problem gambling, stereotyping, social distancing, emotional reactions, and perceived devaluation and discrimination. A hierarchical linear regression was conducted. Results: People with gambling problems attracted substantial negative stereotypes, social distancing, emotional reactions, and status loss/discrimination. These elements were associated with desired social distance, as was perceived that problem gambling is caused by bad character, and is perilous, non-recoverable, and disruptive. Level of contact with problem gambling, gambling involvement, and some demographic variables was significantly associated with social distance, but they explained little additional variance. Discussion and conclusions: This study contributes to the understanding of how and why people experiencing gambling problems are stigmatized. Results suggest the need to increase public contact with such people, avoid perpetuation of stereotypes in media and public health communications, and reduce devaluing and discriminating attitudes and behaviors. © 2016 The Author(s).
Funding
Category 2 - Other Public Sector Grants Category
History
Volume
5Issue
3Start Page
448End Page
456Number of Pages
9eISSN
2063-5303ISSN
2062-5871Publisher
Akademiai Kiado Rt., HungaryPublisher DOI
Full Text URL
Additional Rights
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- Yes
External Author Affiliations
Southern Cross UniversityEra Eligible
- Yes
Journal
Journal of Behavioral AddictionsUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC