CQUniversity
Browse
- No file added yet -

The use of telephone communication between nurse navigators and their patients

Download (481.98 kB)
Version 2 2022-08-29, 02:10
Version 1 2021-01-17, 11:37
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-29, 02:10 authored by B Heritage, Clare HarveyClare Harvey, J Brown, Desley Hegney, Eileen WillisEileen Willis, Adele BaldwinAdele Baldwin, David Heard, Sandra Mclellan, V Clayton, J Claes
Background Hospitals and other health care providers frequently experience difficulties contacting patients and their carers who live remotely from the town where the health service is located. In 2016 Nurse Navigator positions were introduced into the health services by Queensland Health, to support and navigate the care of people with chronic and complex conditions. One hospital in Far North Queensland initiated an additional free telephone service to provide another means of communication for patients and carers with the NNs and for off-campus health professionals to obtain details about a patient utilising the service. Calls made between 7am and 10pm, seven days per week are answered by a nurse navigator. Aim To report utilisation of the service by navigated clients and remotely located clinicians compared to use of navigators' individual work numbers and direct health service numbers. We report the reason for calls to the free number and examine features of these calls. Methods Statistical analysis examined the call reason, duration of calls, setting from where calls originated and stream of calls. Interactions between the reasons for calls and the features of calls, such as contact method, were examined. Results The major reason for calls was clinical issues and the source of calls was primarily patients and carers. Clinical calls were longer in duration. Shorter calls were mainly non-clinical, made by a health professional. Setting for calls was not related to the reason. The most frequent number used was the individual mobile number of the NN, followed by the hospital landline. Although the free number was utilised by patients and carers, it was not the preferred option. Conclusion As patients and carers preferred to access their NN directly than via the 1800 number, further research should explore options best suited to this group of patients outside normal business hours. © 2020 Heritage et al.

Funding

Category 2 - Other Public Sector Grants Category

History

Volume

15

Issue

1

Start Page

1

End Page

13

Number of Pages

13

eISSN

1932-6203

Publisher

PLoS

Additional Rights

CC BY 4.0

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

Acceptance Date

2020-01-02

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

PLoS ONE

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC