Manufacturing managers have a measurable mindset (or frame) that structures their response to the manufacturing environment. Most importantly, this frame represents a set of assumptions about the relative prominence of concepts in the manufacturing domains, about the nature of people, and about the sensemaking processes required to understand the nature of the manufacturing environment as seen through the eyes of manufacturing managers. This paper uses work in the area of text analysis and extends the scope of a methodology that has been approached from two different directions by Carley (Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(51), 533-558, 1997) and Gephart (Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(51), 583-622, 1997). This methodology is termed collacate analysis. Based on the analysis of transcripts of interviews of Australian manufacturing managers mind maps of the concepts used by these managers have been constructed.From an analysis of these mind maps it is argued that strategy plays a minor role in their thinking second only to the improvement domain, whereas design and related concepts play a dominant role in their day-to-day thinking.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
14
Issue
4
Start Page
384
End Page
395
Number of Pages
12
ISSN
0953-7287
Location
UK
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Language
en-aus
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Faculty of Business and Law; TBA Research Institute; University of Technology, Sydney; University of Western Sydney;