posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00authored byC Hulme, I Neath, George StuartGeorge Stuart, L Shostak, A Surprenant, G Brown
The authors report 2 experiments that compare the serial recall of pure lists of long words, pure lists of short words, and lists of long or short words containing just a single isolated word of a different length. In both experiments for pure lists, there was a substantial recall advantage for short words; the isolated words were recalled better than other words in the same list, and there was a reverse word-length effect: Isolated long words were recalled better than isolated short words. These results contradict models that seek to explain the word-length effect in terms of list-based accounts of rehearsal speed or in terms of item-based effects (such as difficulty of assembling items).
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
32
Issue
3
Start Page
586
End Page
594
Number of Pages
9
ISSN
0278-7393
Location
Washington
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Language
en-aus
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Goldsmiths' College; Not affiliated to a Research Institute; Purdue University; University of Warwick; University of York;
Era Eligible
Yes
Journal
Journal of experimental psychology : learning, memory, and cognition.