DOCUMENT
cqu_14788+bin1a68b1a1-cb17-4bf3-a357-6d9a14536756+bin1a68b1a1-cb17-4bf3-a357-6d9a14536756.0.pdf (808.45 kB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_14788+bin1a68b1a1-cb17-4bf3-a357-6d9a14536756+bin1a68b1a1-cb17-4bf3-a357-6d9a14536756.1.pdf (808.45 kB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_14788+bin1a68b1a1-cb17-4bf3-a357-6d9a14536756+bin1a68b1a1-cb17-4bf3-a357-6d9a14536756.2.pdf (808.45 kB)
1/0
The ProQOL-21: A revised version of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale based on Rasch analysis
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-08, 00:00 authored by B Heritage, CS Rees, Desley HegneyThe Professional Quality of Life scale is a measure intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an indication of a caring professional’s compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress. While this measure has been used extensively in nursing research, owing to the relevancy of patient-care associated satisfaction and fatigue within this profession, information regarding the construct validity of this measure is less well represented in the literature. We examined the construct validity of the Professional Quality of Life scale using a Rasch analysis procedure on each of its three scales, as a means of substantiating their measurement adequacy. Responses on the Professional Quality of Life scale from 1615 registered nurses (age x= 46.48 years, SD = 11.78) were analysed. While support for the measurement adequacy (invariance, person/item fit, and unidimensionality) of the compassion satisfaction scale was found, the burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales did not demonstrate adequate measurement properties. We instead present an alternative measurement model of these subscales, involving items from each, to form a robust measure of compassion fatigue, and provide recoding, scoring, and normed scores for both measures. Our findings indicate that use of the Professional Quality of Life scale’s burnout and secondary traumatic stress scales may require caution, while our revised compassion satisfaction and fatigue scales provide robust measurement options for practitioners and researchers. © 2018 Heritage et al.
History
Volume
13Issue
2Start Page
1End Page
20Number of Pages
20eISSN
1932-6203Publisher
Public Library of Science, USAPublisher DOI
Additional Rights
CC BY 4.0 Copyright: © 2018 Heritage et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- Yes
Acceptance Date
2018-02-12External Author Affiliations
Curtin University; Murdoch UniversityEra Eligible
- Yes
Journal
PLoS ONEUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC