File(s) not publicly available

Systematic quantitative literature review on criminological theories in Asia

journal contribution
posted on 14.10.2020, 00:00 by Masahiro SuzukiMasahiro Suzuki, C-F Pai, MJ Islam
Empirical work on criminological theories in Asia has been increasing. However, few comprehensive and systematic reviews on the application of criminological theories in Asia have been conducted. Using a systematic quantitative literature review method on peer-reviewed English-language journal articles, we aim to provide an overview of the use of five major criminological theories in Asia: (1) strain; (2) social learning; (3) control; (4) routine activity; and (5) developmental and life-course. In particular, we address the following four questions: (1) how often are these theories tested in which region of Asia?; (2) what methodology is used to test these theories?; (3) to what extent are these theories supported in the Asian context?; and (4) what cultural uniqueness in the Asian context is taken into account in testing these theories, and what role and effect do they play in analysis and outcome? Findings indicate that the relationship between these theories and the Asian regions is skewed; many studies do not employ rigorous methodologies; these theories are either fully or partially supported in the Asian context; and only a few studies have analyzed the cultural uniqueness of the Asian context, and no effect of cultural uniqueness of the Asian context was found. Research implications for developing criminology in Asia are discussed.

History

Volume

13

Issue

2

Start Page

129

End Page

151

Number of Pages

23

eISSN

1871-014X

ISSN

1871-0131

Publisher

Springer

Peer Reviewed

Yes

Open Access

No

Acceptance Date

27/11/2017

External Author Affiliations

Griffith University

Era Eligible

Yes

Journal

Asian Journal of Criminology