File(s) not publicly available

Socio-economic differences in public opinion regarding water fluoridation in Queensland

journal contribution
posted on 06.12.2017, 00:00 by William MummeryWilliam Mummery, Ryan KiftRyan Kift, Mitchell DuncanMitchell Duncan
Objective: To describe public opinion relating to the fluoridation of drinking water in a sample of the Queensland population. Method: Data were collected by means of a computer-assisted telephone interview survey from a sample of the Queensland population. Descriptive statistics and logistical regression were used to examine associations between variables. Results: Seventy per cent of the total sample supported water fluoridation of their local supply. More than 71% of the total sample agreed that water fluoridation was safe. People living in areas of higher socio-economic / relative socio-economic advantage were more likely to support the addition of fluoride to local drinking water and agree that it was safe. Opinions about fluoridation varied by respondent age and gender. Conclusions: General support was found in this sample of the Queensland population for fluoridation of drinking water. Implications: In Queensland, fluoridationof the water supply is now a political decision. Information about public opinion on fluoridation may assist decision makers in the final determination.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

31

Issue

4

Start Page

336

End Page

339

Number of Pages

4

eISSN

1753-6405

ISSN

1326-0200

Location

Sydney

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing

Language

en-aus

Peer Reviewed

Yes

Open Access

No

External Author Affiliations

Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Health; Institute for Health and Social Science Research (IHSSR);

Era Eligible

Yes

Journal

Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.