File(s) not publicly available
Sleep quantity and quality is not compromised during planned burn shifts of less than 12 h
journal contribution
posted on 2018-09-13, 00:00 authored by Grace VincentGrace Vincent, B Aisbett, Sarah HallSarah Hall, Sally FergusonSally FergusonPlanned burning is a preventative strategy aimed at decreasing fuel loads to reduce the severity of
future wildfire events. During planned burn operations, firefighters can work long shifts.
Furthermore, remote burning locations may require firefighters to sleep away from home between
shifts. The existing evidence surrounding firefighters’ sleep during such operations is exclusively
anecdotal. The aims of the study were to describe firefighters’ sleep during planned burn operations
and evaluate the impact of the key operational factors (shift start time, shift length and sleeping
location) that may contribute to inadequate sleep. Thirty-three salaried firefighters were recruited
from Australia’s fire agencies and sleep was measured objectively using wrist actigraphy for four
weeks. All variables were examined in two conditions: (1) burn days, and (2) non-burn days. Time in
bed, total sleep time, sleep latency and sleep efficiency were evaluated objectively. Subjective
reports of pre- and post-sleep fatigue, sleep location, sleep quality, sleep quantity, number of
times woken and sleep timing were also recorded. Analyses revealed no differences in measures
of sleep quantity and quality when comparing non-burn and burn days. Total sleep time was less
when planned burn shifts were >12 h. However, on burn days, work shift start time as well as
sleeping location did not impact firefighters’ sleep quantity. Self-reported levels of pre- and post-sleep
fatigue were greater on burn days compared to non-burn days. These findings indicate that
sleep quantity and quality are not compromised during planned burn operations <12 h in duration.
History
Volume
33Issue
6Start Page
657End Page
666Number of Pages
10eISSN
1525-6073ISSN
0742-0528Publisher
Taylor & Francis, UKPublisher DOI
Full Text URL
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
External Author Affiliations
Deakin University; Bushfire Co-Operative Research CentreAuthor Research Institute
- Appleton Institute
Era Eligible
- Yes