CQUniversity
Browse

Reliability and validity of a computerized questionnaire to measure fat intake in Belgium

journal contribution
posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00 authored by Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte, C Matthys, I Bourdeaudhuij
This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a Belgian computerized questionnaire to measure fat intake. A total of 86 adults completed a 48-item computerized fat intake questionnaire, subsequently kept a 7-day diet record, and finally completed the questionnaire again. For validity, a Pearson correlation of 0.67 for total fat intake and of 0.60 for percent energy from fat were found between the computerized questionnaire and the diet records. Gross misclassification between the two methods was 5.8% for total fat intake and for percent energy from fat. Cohen’s K values were respectively 0.27 and 0.29. For reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.70 to 0.87 between the two administrations of the computerized fat intake questionnaire. Gross misclassification between the administrations was 1.2% for total fat intake and for percent energy from fat, K values were respectively 0.64 and 0.50. These results indicate that this fat intake questionnaire has an acceptable reliability and validity.

History

Volume

24

Issue

8

Start Page

621

End Page

631

Number of Pages

11

eISSN

1879-0739

ISSN

0271-5317

Location

Amsterdam

Publisher

Elsevier Inc

Language

en-aus

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

External Author Affiliations

Rijksuniversiteit te Gent;

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Nutrition research.

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC