DOCUMENT
cqu_15236+bin82dfd55b-7ec5-4722-b6a2-5bccdbd2f7c4+bin82dfd55b-7ec5-4722-b6a2-5bccdbd2f7c4.0.pdf (2.45 MB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_15236+bin82dfd55b-7ec5-4722-b6a2-5bccdbd2f7c4+bin82dfd55b-7ec5-4722-b6a2-5bccdbd2f7c4.1.pdf (2.45 MB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_15236+bin82dfd55b-7ec5-4722-b6a2-5bccdbd2f7c4+bin82dfd55b-7ec5-4722-b6a2-5bccdbd2f7c4.2.pdf (2.45 MB)
1/0
Reflective and non-conscious responses to exercise images
journal contribution
posted on 2018-06-22, 00:00 authored by K Cope, Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte, CE Short, DE Conroy, RE Rhodes, B Jackson, JA Dimmock, Amanda RebarAmanda RebarImages portraying exercise are commonly used to promote exercise behavior and to measure automatic associations of exercise (e.g., via implicit association tests). The effectiveness of these promotion efforts and the validity of measurement techniques partially rely on the untested assumption that the images being used are perceived by the general public as portrayals of exercise that is pleasant and motivating. The aim of this study was to investigate how content of images impacted people's automatic and reflective evaluations of exercise images. Participants (N = 90) completed a response time categorization task (similar to the implicit association test) to capture how automatically people perceived each image as relevant to Exercise or Not exercise. Participants also self-reported their evaluations of the images using visual analog scales with the anchors: Exercise/Not exercise, Does not motivate me to exercise/Motivates me to exercise, Pleasant/Unpleasant, and Energizing/Deactivating. People tended to more strongly automatically associate images with exercise if the images were of an outdoor setting, presented sport (as opposed to active labor or gym-based) activities, and included young (as opposed to middle-aged) adults. People tended to reflectively find images of young adults more motivating and relevant to exercise than images of older adults. The content of exercise images is an often overlooked source of systematic variability that may impact measurement validity and intervention effectiveness. © 2018 Cope, Vandelanotte, Short, Conroy, Rhodes, Jackson, Dimmock and Rebar.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
8Start Page
1End Page
9Number of Pages
9eISSN
1664-1078Publisher
Frontiers Research Foundation, SwitzerlandPublisher DOI
Additional Rights
CC-BYPeer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- Yes
Acceptance Date
2017-12-14External Author Affiliations
University of Western Australia; University of Victoria, Canada; Northwestern University, USA; Pennsylvania State University; The University of AdelaideEra Eligible
- Yes
Journal
Frontiers in PsychologyUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC