posted on 2018-07-10, 00:00authored byC Toye, R Moorin, S Slatyer, SM Aoun, R Parsons, Desley Hegney, S Maher, KD Hill
Background: Presentations to hospital of older people receiving family care at home incur substantial costs for
patients, families, and the health care system, yet there can be positive carer outcomes when systematically assessing/
addressing their support needs, and reductions in older people’s returns to hospital attributed to appropriate discharge
planning. This study will trial the Further Enabling Care at Home program, a 2-week telephone outreach initiative for
family carers of older people returning home from hospital. Hypotheses are that the program will (a) better
prepare families to sustain their caregiving role and (b) reduce patients' re-presentations/readmissions to hospital,
and/or their length of stay; also that reduced health system costs attributable to the program will outweigh costs
of its implementation.
Methods/Design: In this randomised controlled trial, family carers of older patients aged 70+ discharged from a
Medical Assessment Unit in a Western Australian tertiary hospital, plus the patients themselves, will be recruited
at discharge (N = 180 dyads). Carers will be randomly assigned (block allocation, assessors blinded) to receive
usual care (control) or the new program (intervention). The primary outcome is the carer’s self-reported preparedness
for caregiving (Preparedness for Caregiving Scale administered within 4 days of discharge, 2–3 weeks post-discharge,
6 weeks post-discharge). To detect a clinically meaningful change of two points with 80 % power, 126 carers need to
complete the study. Patients’ returns to hospital and subsequent length of stay will be ascertained for a minimum of
3 months after the index admission. Regression analyses will be used to determine differences in carer and patient
outcomes over time associated with the group (intervention or control). Data will be analysed using an Intention
to Treat approach. A qualitative exploration will examine patients’ and their family carers’ experiences of the new
program (interviews) and explore the hospital staff’s perceptions (focus groups). Process evaluation will identify
barriers to, and facilitators of, program implementation. A comprehensive economic evaluation will determine
cost consequences.
Discussion: This study investigates a novel approach to identifying and addressing family carers’ needs following
discharge from hospital of the older person receiving care. If successful, the program has potential to be incorporated
into routine post-discharge support.
Curtin University; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital; University of Western Australia; Department of Research, Silver Chain Group; University of Southern Queensland; University of Adelaide