CQUniversity
Browse

Prophylactic postoperative noninvasive ventilation in adults undergoing upper abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

journal contribution
posted on 2025-04-22, 00:11 authored by Jane Lockstone, Linda Denehy, Dominic Truong, Georgina A Whish-Wilson, Ianthe Boden, Shaza Abo, Selina M Parry
OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following upper abdominal surgery. Applying either noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the early postoperative period is suggested to prevent PPC. We aimed to assess whether postoperative NIV or CPAP or both prevent PPCs compared with standard care in adults undergoing upper abdominal surgery, including in those identified at higher PPC risk. Additionally, the different interventions used were evaluated to assess whether there is a superior approach. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase‚ CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception to May 17, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: We performed a systematic search of the literature for randomized controlled trials evaluating prophylactic NIV and/or CPAP in the postoperative period. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently performed study selection and data extraction. Individual study risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale, and certainty in outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 17 studies enrolling 6,108 patients. No significant benefit was demonstrated for postoperative NIV/CPAP to reduce PPC (risk ratio [RR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78–1.01; very low certainty), including in adults identified at higher PPC risk (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77–1.07; very low certainty). No intervention approach was identified as superior, and no significant benefit was demonstrated when comparing: 1) CPAP (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79–1.04; very low certainty), 2) NIV (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41–1.13; very low certainty), 3) continuous NIV/CPAP (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77–1.05; very low certainty), or 4) intermittent NIV/CPAP (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.39–1.10; very low certainty) to standard care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest routine provision of either prophylactic NIV or CPAP following upper abdominal surgery may not be effective to reduce PPCs‚ including in those identified at higher risk.

History

Volume

50

Issue

10

Start Page

1522

End Page

1532

Number of Pages

11

eISSN

1530-0293

ISSN

0090-3493

Publisher

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Critical Care Medicine

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC