CQUniversity
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Predictors of retention in a randomised trial of smoking cessation in low-socioeconomic status Australian smokers

journal contribution
posted on 2018-06-18, 00:00 authored by RJ Courtney, P Clare, V Boland, KA Martire, B Bonevski, W Hall, M Siahpush, R Borland, Christopher DoranChristopher Doran, R West
Background and aims Little is known about the factors associated with retention in smoking cessation trials, especially for low-socioeconomic status (low-SES) smokers. This study examined the factors associated with retention of low-SES smokers in the Australian Financial Interventions for Smoking Cessation Among Low-Income Smokers (FISCALS) trial. Design A two-group parallel block randomised open-label trial with allocation concealment. Setting Australia. The study was conducted primarily by telephone-based interviews with nicotine replacement therapy delivered via mail. Participants 1047 low-SES smokers interested in quitting smoking were randomised. Measurements Participants completed computer assisted telephone interviews (CATIs) at baseline, 2-month and 8-month follow-up. Smoking-related, substance use, mental or physical health, general psychological constructs, sociodemographic and recruitment sources association with retention at 8-month follow-up were examined using binary logistic regression. Findings 946 participants (90%) completed the 2-month follow-up interview and 880 participants (84%) completed the 8-month follow-up interview. Retention at 8-months was associated with higher motivation to quit (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.27 p < 0.01), more recent quit attempts (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.40 p < 0.05), increasing age (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07 p < 0.01), and higher level of education (OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.45, 3.46 p < 0.01). Lower retention at 8-months occurred for those participants recruited from posters placed in Department of Human Service Centrelink Offices (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.89, p < 0.05) compared to participants recruited from Quitline services. No significant differences in retention were found for participants recruited via newspaper advertisements or word of mouth compared to Quitline services. No significant associations were found between health-related or behavioural factors and retention. Conclusions In the context of high overall retention rates from disadvantaged smokers in a randomised trial, retention was greater in those smokers with higher motivation to quit, more recent quit attempts, increased age, higher level of education and for those recruited through Quitline or newspaper advertisements. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

64

Start Page

13

End Page

20

Number of Pages

8

eISSN

1873-6327

ISSN

0306-4603

Publisher

Pergamon Press, UK

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2016-07-30

External Author Affiliations

University College London, UK; Cancer Council Victoria; University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States; University of Queensland; University of Newcastle; University of New South Wales

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Addictive Behaviors

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC