CQUniversity
Browse

Practice nursing: A systematic literature review of facilitators and barriers in three countries

This item contains files with download restrictions
Version 2 2024-11-27, 01:19
Version 1 2024-09-09, 00:15
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-27, 01:19 authored by C Verrall, Eileen WillisEileen Willis, J Henderson
Background: Practice Nurses (PN) play an increasing role in chronic disease management, however, this role is poorly defined. Question: How do Practice Nurses in New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom manage chronic disease? Aim: This systematic review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators for practice nurses in New Zealand (NZ), Canada and the United Kingdom (UK) when caring for patients with a chronic disease. To determine how Practice Nurses in three high income countries manage chronic disease. Methods: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, (CINAHL), and MEDLINE in February 2021. The initial search yielded 495 articles. Four hundred and sixty-four articles were excluded because they did not address the research question or included the community nurse or nurse practitioner. Nine articles with a total sample size of 1050 PN participants met the inclusion criteria. Findings: Six main themes were identified that outline the barriers and facilitators to the role of the practice nurse when managing chronic disease: financial incentives, funding, power differences between the nurse and patient and the nurse and doctor, time, education, and role ambiguity. Discussion: Policy initiatives across the three countries were replicated with similar barriers and facilitators to the PN role. Conclusion: Working within a context driven by incentive funding and competing demands can be prohibitive to the effective management of chronic disease by the PN.

History

Volume

30

Issue

2

Start Page

254

End Page

263

Number of Pages

10

eISSN

1876-7575

ISSN

1322-7696

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Additional Rights

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (AAM)

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

Acceptance Date

2022-09-08

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Collegian

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC