File(s) not publicly available

Physical and decision-making demands of Australian football umpires during competitive matches

journal contribution
posted on 20.08.2019, 00:00 by Nathan ElsworthyNathan Elsworthy, D Burke, BR Scott, CJ Stevens, BJ Dascombe
This study examined the physical and decision-making requirements of elite Australian football (AF) umpires during match play. Twenty-nine field umpires were assessed across 20 AF League matches. Physical demands were monitored using global positioning system devices to record the total distance covered and high-speed running (HSR; >14.4 km·h-1) demands across each quarter. Decision-making performance was assessed through video by 3 elite umpire coaches who reviewed free-kick accuracy during each match. These data were further analyzed according to the position (mid-zone or end-zone) of the umpire when each decision was made. The average distance covered was 10,563 ± 608 m, of which 1,952 ± 494 m was HSR. Significant reductions in distance covered were observed during the third (p = 0.006) and fourth (p = 0.001) quarters, compared with the first. An average of 44 ± 8 free kicks awarded per match with a decision accuracy of 84 ± 6%; however, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in these measures across a match. Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher physical (HSR; relative distance) and decision-making requirements were observed within the midzone. The current data quantify the physical and decisionmaking demands of AF umpiring and demonstrated that despite a high physical workload, free-kick accuracy is maintained across a match. This suggests that decision making may not be directly compromised by the intermittent running demands of AF umpires. Positional rotations between the mid-zone and end-zone position allow for the demands to be shared among all field umpires during a match. © 2014 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

History

Volume

28

Issue

12

Start Page

3502

End Page

3507

Number of Pages

6

eISSN

1533-4287

ISSN

1064-8011

Publisher

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA

Peer Reviewed

Yes

Open Access

No

External Author Affiliations

University of Newcastle

Era Eligible

Yes

Journal

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Usage metrics

Exports