CQUniversity
Browse

Physical activity screening to recruit inactive randomized controlled trial participants : How much is too much?

Download (387.11 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00 authored by Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte, Robert StantonRobert Stanton, Amanda RebarAmanda Rebar, Anetta Van ItallieAnetta Van Itallie, Cristina Caperchione, Mitchell Duncan, TN Savage, RR Rosenkranz, GS Kolt
Screening physical activity levels is common in trials to increase physical activity in inactive populations. Commonly applied single-item screening tools might not always be effective in identifying those who are inactive. We applied the more extensive Active Australia Survey to identify inactive people among those who had initially been misclassified as too active using a single-item measure. Those enrolled after the Active Australia Survey screening had significantly higher physical activity levels at subsequent baseline assessment. Thus, more extensive screening measures might result in the inclusion of participants who would otherwise be excluded, possibly introducing unwanted bias.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

16

Start Page

446

End Page

448

Number of Pages

3

ISSN

1745-6215

Location

United Kingdom

Publisher

BioMed Central

Language

en-aus

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2015-09-25

External Author Affiliations

Kansas State University; School of Human, Health and Social Sciences (2013- ); TBA Research Institute; University of British Columbia; University of Newcastle; University of Western Sydney;

Era Eligible

  • No

Journal

Trials.

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC