File(s) not publicly available
Patellar and Achilles tendinopathies are predominantly peripheral pain states: A blinded case control study of somatosensory and psychological profiles
journal contribution
posted on 2019-07-24, 00:00 authored by ML Plinsinga, CP Van Wilgen, MS Brink, V Vuvan, A Stephenson, Luke HealesLuke Heales, R Mellor, BK Coombes, BT Vicenzinostudy design Case–control design. background Tendinopathy is characterised by pain on tendon loading. In persistent cases of upper limb tendinopathy, it is frequently associated with central nervous system sensitisation, whereas less commonly linked in the case of persistent lower limb tendinopathies. Objectives Compare somatosensory and psychological profiles of participants with persistent patellar (PT) and Achilles tendinopathies (AT) with pain free controls. Methods A comprehensive battery of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) was assessed at standardised sites of the affected tendon and remotely (lateral elbow) by a blinded assessor. Participants completed the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment, a health-related quality of life questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Active Australia Questionnaire. Independent t-test and analysis of covariance (sex-adjusted and age-adjusted) were performed to compare groups. results Participants with PT and AT did not exhibit differences from controls for the QST at the remote site, but there were differences at the affected tendon site. Compared with controls, participants with PT displayed significantly lower pressure pain threshold locally at the tendon (p=0.012) and fewer single limb decline squats before pain onset, whereas participants with AT only displayed fewer single heel raises before pain onset, but this pain was of a higher intensity. Conclusion PT and AT appear to be predominantly local not widespread pain states related to loading of tendons without significant features of central sensitisation. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved.
History
Volume
52Issue
5Start Page
284End Page
291Number of Pages
9eISSN
1473-0480ISSN
0306-3674Publisher
BMJ Group, UKPublisher DOI
Full Text URL
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
Acceptance Date
2017-05-15External Author Affiliations
University of Queensland; University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Pain in Motion Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, BelgiumEra Eligible
- Yes
Journal
British Journal of Sports MedicineUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC