- No file added yet -
New methods to address old challenges: The use of administrative data for longitudinal replication studies of child maltreatment
Version 2 2022-08-24, 06:38Version 2 2022-08-24, 06:38
Version 1 2021-01-17, 11:00Version 1 2021-01-17, 11:00
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-24, 06:38 authored by EJ Hurren, A Stewart, S DennisonAdministrative data are crucial to the “big data” revolution of social science and have played an important role in the development of child maltreatment research. These data are also of value to administrators, policy makers, and clinicians. The focus of this paper is the use of administrative data to produce and replicate longitudinal studies of child maltreatment. Child protection administrative data have several advantages. They are often population-based, and allow longitudinal examination of child maltreatment and complex multi-level analyses. They also allow comparison across subgroups and minority groups, remove burden from individuals to disclose traumatic experiences, and can be less biased than retrospective recall. Finally, they can be linked to data from other agencies to explore comorbidity and outcomes, and are comparatively cost and time effective. The benefits and challenges associated with the use of administrative data for longitudinal child maltreatment research become magnified when these data are used to produce replications. Techniques to address challenges and support future replication efforts include developing a biographical understanding of the systems from which the data are drawn, using multiple data sources to contextualize the data and research results, recognizing and adopting various approaches to replication, and documenting all data coding and manipulation processes. These techniques are illustrated in this paper via a case study of previous replication work. © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
History
Volume
14Issue
9Start Page
1End Page
12Number of Pages
12eISSN
1660-4601ISSN
1661-7827Publisher
MDPI AG, SwitzerlandPublisher DOI
Full Text URL
Additional Rights
CC BY 4.0Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- Yes
Acceptance Date
2017-09-06External Author Affiliations
Griffith UniversityEra Eligible
- Yes
Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC