CQUniversity
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Mental health education in occupational therapy professional preparation programs: Alignment between clinician priorities and coverage in university curricula

journal contribution
posted on 2018-04-24, 00:00 authored by JN Scanlan, Pamela Meredith, K Haracz, P Ennals, G Pépin, JS Webster, K Arblaster, S Wright, Network ANZOTMHA
© 2017 Occupational Therapy Australia Background/aim: Occupational therapy programs must prepare graduates for work in mental health. However, this area of practice is complex and rapidly changing. This study explored the alignment between educational priorities identified by occupational therapists practising in mental health and level of coverage of these topics in occupational therapy programs in Australia and New Zealand. Methods: Surveys were distributed to heads of all occupational therapy programs across Australia and New Zealand. The survey included educational priorities identified by occupational therapists in mental health from a previous study. Respondents were requested to identify the level of coverage given to each of these priorities within their curriculum. These data were analysed to determine a ranking of educational topics in terms of level of coverage in university programs. Results: Responses were received for 19 programs from 16 universities. Thirty-four topics were given ‘High-level coverage’ in university programs, and these were compared against the 29 topics classified as ‘Essential priorities’ by clinicians. Twenty topics were included in both the ‘Essential priorities’ and ‘High-level coverage’ categories. Topics considered to be ‘Essential priorities’ by clinicians which were not given ‘High-level coverage’ in university programs included the following: mental health fieldwork experiences; risk assessment and management; professional self-care resilience and sensory approaches. Conclusion: While there appears to be overall good alignment between mental health curricula and priorities identified by practising occupational therapists, there are some discrepancies. These discrepancies are described and establish a strong foundation for further discussion between clinicians, academics and university administration to support curriculum review and revision.

History

Volume

64

Issue

6

Start Page

436

End Page

447

Number of Pages

12

eISSN

1440-1630

ISSN

0045-0766

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Australia

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

External Author Affiliations

University of Sydney; Sydney Local Health District; University of Newcastle; Western Sydney University; Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District; University of Queensland; La Trobe University; Deakin University; University of South Australia; Otago polytechnic, New Zealand

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Australian Occupational Therapy Journal

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC