Is self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile_ Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers.pdf (540.49 kB)
Download fileIs self-reporting workplace activity worthwhile? Validity and reliability of occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire in desk-based workers
journal contribution
posted on 2022-04-27, 04:27 authored by Scott J Pedersen, Cecilia KiticCecilia Kitic, Marie-Louise Bird, Casey P Mainsbridge, P Dean CooleyBackground: With the advent of workplace health and wellbeing programs designed to address prolonged occupational sitting, tools to measure behaviour change within this environment should derive from empirical evidence. In this study we measured aspects of validity and reliability for the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire that asks employees to recount the percentage of work time they spend in the seated, standing, and walking postures during a typical workday. Methods: Three separate cohort samples (N = 236) were drawn from a population of government desk-based employees across several departmental agencies. These volunteers were part of a larger state-wide intervention study. Workplace sitting and physical activity behaviour was measured both subjectively against the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and objectively against ActivPal accelerometers before the intervention began. Criterion validity and concurrent validity for each of the three posture categories were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, and a bias comparison with 95 % limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability of the survey was reported with intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Criterion validity for this survey was strong for sitting and standing estimates, but weak for walking. Participants significantly overestimated the amount of walking they did at work. Concurrent validity was moderate for sitting and standing, but low for walking. Test-retest reliability of this survey proved to be questionable for our sample. Conclusions: Based on our findings we must caution occupational health and safety professionals about the use of employee self-report data to estimate workplace physical activity. While the survey produced accurate measurements for time spent sitting at work it was more difficult for employees to estimate their workplace physical activity.
Funding
Category 3 - Industry and Other Research Income
History
Volume
16Issue
1Start Page
1End Page
6Number of Pages
6eISSN
1471-2458ISSN
1471-2458Location
EnglandPublisher
BioMed CentralPublisher License
CC BYPublisher DOI
Additional Rights
CC BY 4.0Language
engPeer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- Yes
Acceptance Date
2016-08-17External Author Affiliations
University of TasmaniaEra Eligible
- Yes
Medium
ElectronicJournal
BMC Public HealthArticle Number
836Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Physical activitySitting behaviourWorkplaceExerciseAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthOccupationsPostureReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSedentary BehaviorSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesWalkingPublic HealthHuman Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classifiedExercise PhysiologyBusiness and Management not elsewhere classified