CQUniversity
Browse

Interpretive focus groups: A participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data

Download (433.16 kB)
Version 2 2022-10-12, 04:52
Version 1 2018-08-29, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2022-10-12, 04:52 authored by Michelle Redman-Maclaren, J Mills, R Tommbe
Participatory approaches to qualitative research practice constantly change in response to evolving research environments. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data, despite epistemological and ethical challenges. Interpretive focus groups can be described as a more participative method for groups to analyse qualitative data. Objective: To facilitate interpretive focus groups with women in Papua New Guinea to extend analysis of existing qualitative data and co-create new primary data. The purpose of this was to inform a transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action. Design: A two-step approach was used in a grounded theory study about how women experience male circumcision in Papua New Guinea. Participants analysed portions or 'chunks' of existing qualitative data in story circles and built upon this analysis by using the visual research method of storyboarding. Results: New understandings of the data were evoked when women in interpretive focus groups analysed the data 'chunks'. Interpretive focus groups encouraged women to share their personal experiences about male circumcision. The visual method of storyboarding enabled women to draw pictures to represent their experiences. This provided an additional focus for whole-of-group discussions about the research topic. Conclusions: Interpretive focus groups offer opportunity to enhance trustworthiness of findings when researchers undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data. The co-analysis of existing data and cogeneration of new data between research participants and researchers informed an emergent transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action. © 2014 Michelle Redman-MacLaren et al.Background:

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

7

Issue

1

Start Page

1

End Page

6

Number of Pages

6

eISSN

1654-9880

ISSN

1654-9716

Publisher

Taylor & Francis Open

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

External Author Affiliations

James Cook University; Pacific Adventist University

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Global Health Action

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC