File(s) not publicly available
In-hospital use of automated external defibrillators does not improve survival
The use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) following a cardiac arrest in the out-of-hospital setting has demonstrated increased survival rates, likely because up to 71% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are associated with rhythm disturbances that are able to be treated with defibrillation. It is less clear whether the use of AEDs in the hospital setting would be effective because fewer patients (approximately 25%) have initial cardiac rhythms that respond to defibrillation and because survival may be compromised if the use of AEDs contributes to interruptions in the delivery of chest compressions.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
24Issue
4Start Page
210End Page
212Number of Pages
3eISSN
1878-1721ISSN
1036-7314Location
United StatesPublisher
ElsevierPublisher DOI
Full Text URL
Language
en-ausPeer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
External Author Affiliations
Central Gippsland Health Service; Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Health; Institute for Health and Social Science Research (IHSSR);Era Eligible
- Yes