Glitches and hitches_Sessional academic staff viewpoints on academic integrity and academic misconduct.pdf (2.04 MB)
Download file

Glitches and hitches: Sessional academic staff viewpoints on academic integrity and academic misconduct

Download (2.04 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 06.06.2022, 00:11 authored by Jo-Anne LuckJo-Anne Luck, Ritesh ChughRitesh Chugh, Darren TurnbullDarren Turnbull, Edward PemberEdward Pember
Increasing incidents of academic dishonesty are a problem for universities globally. The traditional approach to dealing with academic dishonesty has been to detect and punish, which may not be the best solution. This study explored the perceptions of sessional teaching staff (a growing but often neglected workforce) on academic integrity and misconduct issues at an Australian university. Findings from the focus groups revealed a deep-seated concern for the size and extent of the problem. While some participants were of the view that students should be punished, others provided interesting suggestions to reduce instances of academic misconduct. This study found that prevention is preferable to punishment as a guiding principle for policy development to address academic misconduct in universities. Students should be educated on the importance of mastering established academic protocols as a way of learning the discipline. Universities need to provide sessional academic staff with contextualised professional development activities.

History

Start Page

1

End Page

16

Number of Pages

16

eISSN

1469-8366

ISSN

0729-4360

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Additional Rights

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

Yes

Open Access

Yes

Acceptance Date

20/01/2021

Author Research Institute

Centre for Research in Equity and Advancement of Teaching & Education (CREATE)

Era Eligible

Yes

Journal

Higher Education Research & Development

Usage metrics

Exports