CQUniversity
Browse
- No file added yet -

Functional Foods or Over-Hyped? Observations on the Antioxidant and Phenolic Content of Australian Foodstuffs

Download (244.5 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-30, 03:54 authored by Joel JohnsonJoel Johnson, Janice ManiJanice Mani, Ryan J Batley, Beatriz E Hoyos, Nicola NovelloNicola Novello, Parbat Raj ThaniParbat Raj Thani, Charitha Priyadarshani Ekanayake Arachchige, Pasmita NeupanePasmita Neupane, Mani NaikerMani Naiker
Consumers are showing increasing awareness of the concept of ‘functional foods’: foods that can provide health benefits in addition to their nutritional value. There is particular demand for foods with a high antioxidant and phenolic content, which may improve cardiovascular health, reduce inflammation, and slow or prevent the onset of chronic, non-communicable diseases. However, there is a lack of comprehensive databases using consistent analytical protocols to analyze the antioxidant and phenolic content of different food types, particularly in regional areas such as Australia. Over the past four years, our laboratory has analyzed over 1000 food-related samples using several antioxidant capacity assays (ferric reducing antioxidant power—FRAP—and cupric reducing antioxidant capacity—CUPRAC), as well as the total phenolic content (TPC) using the Folin–Ciocalteu method. Here, we provide a summary of these data by different food types to inform researchers, policy planners, nutritionists, and consumers about the typical levels of antioxidants and total phenolics found across a range of Australian foodstuffs, particularly grains. The highest antioxidant and phenolic contents were typically found in native Australian fruits, while grains, nuts, and non-native fruits showed lower antioxidant and phenolic contents. Spices, processed foodstuffs, and non-fruit native Australian foods showed an intermediate content. Furthermore, medicinally used plants showed a much higher phenolic content and antioxidant capacity compared to non-medicinal plants. Finally, we present correlations between the various analytes.

History

Volume

26

Issue

1

Start Page

1

End Page

7

Number of Pages

7

eISSN

2673-9976

Publisher

MDPI

Additional Rights

CC-BY

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

Acceptance Date

2023-10-14

Author Research Institute

  • Institute for Future Farming Systems

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Biology and Life Sciences Forum

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC