CQUniversity
Browse

Exertional dyspnea responses to the Dyspnea Challenge in heart failure: Comparison to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Download (996.15 kB)
Version 2 2024-02-20, 01:33
Version 1 2023-05-29, 03:31
journal contribution
posted on 2024-02-20, 01:33 authored by Craig R Aitken, Glenn M Stewart, James R Walsh, Tanya PalmerTanya Palmer, Lewis Adams, Surendran Sabapathy, Norman R Morris
Background: In heart failure (HF), exertional dyspnea is a common symptom, but validated field-based tests for its measurement are limited. The Dyspnea Challenge is a two-minute uphill treadmill walk designed to measure exertional dyspnea in cardiopulmonary disease. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to establish the test-retest reliability of the Dyspnea Challenge in HF and to compare the exercise responses to a group with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The study was an experimental, single-blind, randomized, multi-site project that recruited individuals with HF (New York Heart Association I-III) and COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease II-IV). Participants completed two visits. On the first visit, participants performed two six-minute walk tests (6MWT), followed by two to three Dyspnea Challenges to calculate treadmill speed and gradient. At Visit Two, participants performed two separate Dyspnea Challenges, with one including measures of pulmonary gas exchange and central hemodynamics. Results: Twenty-one individuals with HF (10 female; 66§11years; ejection fraction:45.3 § 6.1%; six-minute distance(6MWD) 520 § 97 m), and 25 COPD (11 female; 68 § 10 yr; forced expiratory volume in 1 s:47.6 § 11.5%; 6MWD: 430 § 101 m). Intraclass correlation coefficients demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability for HF (0.94, P<.01) and COPD (0.95, P<.01). While achieving similar end-exercise exertional dyspnea intensities (P=.60), the HF group walked at a higher average speed (4.2 § 0.8 vs. 3.5 § 0.8km¢h 1) and gradient (10.3 § 2.8 vs. 9.6 § 2.8%) and a greater oxygen uptake (P<.01) and ventilation (P<.01) than those with COPD. While achieving similar cardiac outputs (P=.98), stroke volumes (P=.97), and heart rates (P=.83), those with HF displayed a larger arteriovenous oxygen difference (P<.01), while those with COPD exhibited greater decreases in inspiratory capacity (P=.03), arterial oxygen saturation (P=.02), and breathing reserve (P<.01). Conclusions: The Dyspnea Challenge is a reliable test-retest measure of exertional dyspnea in HF. Typical to their pathologies, HF seemed limited by an inadequate modulation of cardiac output, while ventilatory constraints hampered those with COPD.

Funding

Category 3 - Industry and Other Research Income

History

Volume

58

Start Page

108

End Page

115

Number of Pages

8

eISSN

1527-3288

ISSN

0147-9563

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

Acceptance Date

2022-11-20

External Author Affiliations

Griffith University

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Heart & Lung

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC