Version 3 2022-08-17, 05:20Version 3 2022-08-17, 05:20
Version 2 2022-08-03, 00:54Version 2 2022-08-03, 00:54
Version 1 2021-01-16, 17:54Version 1 2021-01-16, 17:54
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-17, 05:20authored byS Bennett, A Pigott, EM Beller, T Haines, Pamela Meredith, C Delaney
Background
Cancer-related fatigue is reported as the most common and distressing symptom experienced by patients with cancer. It can exacerbate
the experience of other symptoms, negatively affect mood, interfere with the ability to carry out everyday activities, and negatively
impact on quality of life. Educational interventions may help people to manage this fatigue or to cope with this symptom, and reduce
its overall burden. Despite the importance of education for managing cancer-related fatigue there are currently no systematic reviews
examining this approach.
Objectives
To determine the effectiveness of educational interventions for managing cancer-related fatigue in adults.
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO,
ERIC, OTseeker and PEDro up to 1st November 2016. We also searched trials registries.
Selection criteria
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of educational interventions focused on cancer-related fatigue where fatigue was a
primary outcome. Studies must have aimed to evaluate the effect of educational interventions designed specifically to manage cancerrelated
fatigue, or to evaluate educational interventions targeting a constellation of physical symptoms or quality of life where fatigue
was the primary focus. The studies could have compared educational interventions with no intervention or wait list controls, usual care
or attention controls, or an alternative intervention for cancer-related fatigue in adults with any type of cancer.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. We resolved differences in opinion by discussion.
Trial authors were contacted for additional information. A third independent person checked the data extraction. The main outcome
considered in this review was cancer-related fatigue.We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a ’Summary of Findings’ table.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)