CQUniversity
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Economic evaluation of the e-Health StandingTall balance exercise programme for fall prevention in people aged 70 years and over

journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-03, 03:30 authored by Meghan Ambrens, KS Van Schooten, T Lung, L Clemson, JCT Close, K Howard, SR Lord, GAR Zijlstra, A Tiedemann, T Valenzuela, Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte, J Chow, G McInerney, L Miles, A Woodbury, K Delbaere
Background: globally, falls and fall-related injuries are the leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality in older people. In our ageing society healthcare costs are increasing, therefore programmes that reduce falls and are considered value for money are needed. Objective: to complete an economic evaluation of an e-Health balance exercise programme that reduced falls and injurious falls in community-dwelling older people compared to usual care from a health and community-care funder perspective. Design: a within-trial economic evaluation of an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Setting: StandingTall was delivered via tablet-computer at home to older community-dwelling people in Sydney, Australia. Participants: five hundred and three individuals aged 70+ years who were independent in activities of daily living, without cognitive impairment, progressive neurological disease or any other unstable or acute medical condition precluding exercise. Main outcome measures: cost-effectiveness was measured as the incremental cost per fall and per injurious fall prevented. Cost-utility was measured as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Main results: the total average cost per patient for programme delivery and care resource cost was $8,321 (standard deviation [SD] 18,958) for intervention participants and $6,829 (SD 15,019) for control participants. The incremental cost per fall prevented was $4,785 and per injurious fall prevented was $6,585. The incremental cost per QALY gained was $58,039 (EQ5D-5L) and $110,698 (AQoL-6D). Conclusion: this evaluation found that StandingTall has the potential to be cost-effective in specific subpopulations of older people, but not necessarily the whole older population.

History

Volume

51

Issue

6

Start Page

1

End Page

10

Number of Pages

10

eISSN

1468-2834

ISSN

0002-0729

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Additional Rights

All rights reserved

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2022-04-14

External Author Affiliations

University of Sydney; Neuroscience Research Australia; University of New South Wales

Author Research Institute

  • Appleton Institute

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Medium

Print

Journal

Age and Ageing

Article Number

ARTN afac130