Does size matter? An examination of problem gamblers’ skin conductance responses to large and small magnitude rewards
© 2017 Society for Psychophysiological Research Previous research has shown that individuals with substance use disorder equally value small and large magnitude rewards. This has led some researchers to conceptualize the problematic behaviors associated with this disorder as being, at least in part, caused by a deficiency in processing reward stimuli. Considering the documented similarities between substance use disorder and disordered gambling, the current study sought to investigate whether problem gamblers also display such an aberrant pattern of incentive processing. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) to small and large magnitude wins were recorded from 16 problem gamblers (PGs) and 16 healthy controls (HCs) while they completed a computer-simulated electronic gaming machine task. The results show that, while large wins elicited greater SCRs compared to small wins for the HC group, no difference in SCR amplitude was found following large and small wins in the PG group. These findings suggest that problem gamblers may be less effective at evaluating the value of incentives, and are discussed in terms of relevant theoretical frameworks.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
54Issue
10Start Page
1541End Page
1548Number of Pages
8eISSN
1469-8986ISSN
0048-5772Publisher
WileyPublisher DOI
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
Acceptance Date
2017-04-13Era Eligible
- Yes
Journal
PsychophysiologyUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC