Since its inception in 1999, the distributed leadership framework of
Spillane, Halverson, and Diamond [2004. “Towards a Theory
of Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective.” Journal of
Curriculum Studies 36 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726]
has supported research into leadership and change in schools.
Whilst the conceptual integrity of the framework is sound, research
based upon its premises has attracted some criticism. The research
has had a narrowed focus which has not generally reflected the
inseparability of the elements of the framework and the situation
within which leadership is enacted. In addition, it often fails to
account for the complexity of critical elements of the environment
such as micropolitics. This position paper proposes a reconfiguration
of the distributed leadership framework as a research framework in
response to this critique. The paper asserts that this new perspective
that is presented is able to respond to the critique through an
integrated approach that encompasses situation, social distribution
and task enactment and which supports an integrated approach to
research methodology. This adapted framework has the potential to
more fully support research design that is actuality holistic and
embedded in the context.