CQUniversity
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Distractors in obstetric ultrasound: Do sonographers have safety concerns?

journal contribution
posted on 2019-10-16, 00:00 authored by Afrooz Najafzadeh AbrizAfrooz Najafzadeh Abriz, N Woodrow, K Thoirs
Introduction: Obstetric sonography is a highly skilled diagnostic medical examination. Pregnant women like to socialise their ultrasound experience with family, introducing distractions for the sonographer. Our objective was to survey ultrasound practitioners to identify concerns regarding interruptions and their opinions about socialisation during the examination. Methods: An online questionnaire was disseminated to study the views of Australian and New Zealand obstetric sonographers/sonologists. It was informed by a pilot study of possible distractors with quality and safety concerns and operator opinions regarding family bonding. Results: The opinions of 393 obstetric sonographers/sonologists informed our results. Distractors with the most negative aspects included disruptive children (93.3%) and mobile phone conversations (84.3%). Most respondents (62%) believed that a distractor only had to be present for 5 min or less to have an impact. Small children were identified by 87.5% of respondents as safety risks to themselves, to the patient and to sonographers. Sonographers were concerned that distractors caused a loss of concentration, interruption to a systematic scanning approach and increased false negatives in screening, missing important diagnoses. Sonographers strongly agreed that obstetric sonography facilitated maternal–fetal bonding, but only 15% thought that siblings bond with the fetus during the scan. Conclusion: Obstetric sonographers in our study are concerned that distractors pose a negative impact on the quality and safety of ultrasound. They also recognise the importance of family bonding. Strategies to bridge the medical and social components of obstetric sonography should be developed to reduce quality and safety threats.

History

Volume

22

Issue

3

Start Page

206

End Page

213

Number of Pages

8

eISSN

2205-0140

ISSN

1836-6864

Publisher

Wiley

Language

en

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

External Author Affiliations

Global Diagnostics Australia; Royal Women’s Hospital, Victoria; University of South Australia

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC