CQUniversity
Browse

Contributions of tester experience and a checklist guideline to the identification of categories and choices for software testing

Download (759.92 kB)
Version 2 2022-11-02, 06:22
Version 1 2018-11-27, 00:00
journal contribution
posted on 2022-11-02, 06:22 authored by Pak PoonPak Poon, TH Tse, S-F Tang, F-C Kuo
An early step for most black-box testing methods is to identify a set of categories and choices (or their equivalents) from the specification. The identification is often performed in an ad hoc manner, thus the quality of categories and choices is in doubt. Poorly identified categories and choices will affect the comprehensiveness of test cases. In this paper, we describe several comparative studies using three commercial specifications and discuss the major results. The objectives of our studies are (a) to investigate the differences in the types and amounts of mistakes made between inexperienced and experienced software testers in an ad hoc identification approach and (b) to determine the extent of mistake reduction after discussing the mistakes with the software testers and providing them with an identification checklist.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

19

Issue

1

Start Page

141

End Page

163

Number of Pages

23

eISSN

1573-1367

ISSN

0963-9314

Publisher

Springer Verlag

Additional Rights

CC BY NC

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

External Author Affiliations

Swinburne University; University of Hong Kong

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Software Quality Journal

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC