CQUniversity
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Clusters of health behaviours in Queensland adults are associated with different socio-demographic characteristics

Version 2 2022-08-15, 04:15
Version 1 2021-01-16, 17:46
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-15, 04:15 authored by M Hobbs, MJ Duncan, P Collins, J Mckenna, Stephanie SchoeppeStephanie Schoeppe, Amanda RebarAmanda Rebar, Stephanie AlleyStephanie Alley, C Short, Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte
Background: The co-occurrence of unhealthy lifestyles, calls for interventions that target multiple health behaviours. This study investigates the clustering of health behaviours and examines demographic differences between each cluster. Methods: In total, 934 adults from Queensland, Australia completed a cross-sectional survey assessing multiple health behaviours. A two-step hierarchical cluster analysis using multiple iterations identified the optimal number of clusters and the subset of distinguishing health behaviour variables. Univariate analyses of variance and chi-squared tests assessed difference in health behaviours by socio-demographic factors and clusters. Results: Three clusters were identified: the 'lower risk' cluster (n = 436) reported the healthiest profile and met all public health guidelines. The 'elevated risk' cluster (n = 105) reported a range of unhealthy behaviours such as excessive alcohol consumption, sitting time, fast-food consumption, smoking, inactivity and a lack of fruit and vegetables. The 'moderate risk behaviour' cluster (n = 393) demonstrated some unhealthy behaviours with low physical activity levels and poor dietary outcomes. The 'elevated risk' cluster were significantly younger and more socio-economically disadvantaged than both the 'lower and moderate risk' clusters. Discussion: Younger people who live in more deprived areas were largely within the 'elevated risk' cluster and represent an important population for MHBC interventions given their wide range of unhealthy behaviours.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

41

Issue

2

Start Page

268

End Page

277

Number of Pages

10

eISSN

1741-3850

ISSN

1741-3842

Location

England

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Language

eng

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

Acceptance Date

2018-02-13

External Author Affiliations

University of Adelaide; Leeds Beckett University, The University of Newcastle, Leeds Trinity University, UK

Author Research Institute

  • Appleton Institute

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Journal of Public Health

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC