CQUniversity
Browse
DOCUMENT
cqu_16232+bin73ba2608-426f-445b-963f-69b83ba312d0+bin73ba2608-426f-445b-963f-69b83ba312d0.0.pdf (1.29 MB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_16232+bin73ba2608-426f-445b-963f-69b83ba312d0+bin73ba2608-426f-445b-963f-69b83ba312d0.1.pdf (1.29 MB)
DOCUMENT
cqu_16232+bin73ba2608-426f-445b-963f-69b83ba312d0+bin73ba2608-426f-445b-963f-69b83ba312d0.2.pdf (1.29 MB)
1/0
3 files

Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: Challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria

journal contribution
posted on 2018-08-28, 00:00 authored by Dragana StanleyDragana Stanley, RJ Hughes, MS Geier, RJ Moore
Identification of bacteria associated with desirable productivity outcomes in animals may offer a direct approach to the identification of probiotic bacteria for use in animal production. We performed three controlled chicken trials (n = 96) to investigate caecal microbiota differences between the best and poorest performing birds using four performance measures; feed conversion ratio (FCR), utilization of energy from the feed measured as apparent metabolisable energy, gain rate (GR), and amount of feed eaten (FE). The shifts in microbiota composition associated with the performance measures were very different between the three trials. Analysis of the caecal microbiota revealed that the high and low FCR birds had significant differences in the abundance of some bacteria as demonstrated by shifts in microbiota alpha and beta diversity. Trials 1 and 2 showed significant overall community shifts, however, the microbial changes driving the difference between good and poor performers were very different. Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae families and genera Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium and multiple lineages of genus Clostridium (from families Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Erysipelotrichaceae) were highly abundant in good FCR birds in Trial 1. Different microbiota was associated with FCR in Trial 2; Catabacteriaceae and unknown Clostridiales family members were increased in good FCR and genera Clostridium (from family Clostridiaceae) and Lactobacillus were associated with poor FCR. Trial 3 had only mild microbiota differences associated with all four performance measures. Overall, the genus Lactobacillus was correlated with feed intake which resulted in poor FCR performance. The genus Faecalibacterium correlated with improved FCR, increased GR and reduced FE. There was overlap in phylotypes correlated with improved FCR and GR, while different microbial cohorts appeared to be correlated with FE. Even under controlled conditions different cohorts of birds developed distinctly different microbiotas. Within the different trial groups the abundance of certain bacterial groups correlated with productivity outcomes. However, with different underlying microbiotas there were different bacteria correlated with performance. The challenge will be to identify probiotic bacteria that can reliably deliver favorable outcomes from diverse microbiotas. © 2016 Stanley, Hughes, Geier and Moore.

Funding

Category 4 - CRC Research Income

History

Volume

7

Start Page

1

End Page

13

Number of Pages

13

eISSN

1664-302X

Publisher

Frontiers Research Foundation, Switzerland

Additional Rights

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

External Author Affiliations

University of New England; South Australian Research and Development Institute; University of Adelaide; University of South Australia; CSIRO; RMIT; Monash University

Author Research Institute

  • Institute for Future Farming Systems

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Frontiers in Microbiology