CQUniversity
Browse
- No file added yet -

Associations between occupational indicators and total, work-based and leisure-time sitting : a cross-sectional study

Download (387.47 kB)
Version 2 2023-02-23, 05:51
Version 1 2021-01-14, 21:16
journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-23, 05:51 authored by Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte, Mitchell Duncan, Camille Short, Matthew RockloffMatthew Rockloff, Kevin Ronan, Brenda Happell, Vitale Di MiliaVitale Di Milia
Background: A better understanding of how occupational indicators (e.g. job type, doing shift-work, hours worked, physical demand) influence sitting time will aid in the design of more effective health behaviour interventions. The aim of the study was to examine the associations between several occupational indicators and total, occupational and leisure-time sitting. Methods: Cross-sectional self-report data was collected in November 2011 from 1194 participants through a telephone interview in regional Queensland, Australia (response rate was 51.9%). The Workforce Sitting Questionnaire was used to measure sitting time. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine associations between sitting time and occupational indicators. Results: Of all participants 77.9% were employed full-time, 72.7% had white-collar jobs, 35.7% were engaged in shift-work, 39.5% had physically demanding jobs, and 53.2% had high total sitting time (>8 hours a day). Those in physically demanding and blue-collar occupations were less likely to report high total (physically demanding: OR = 0.41,95% CI = 0.29–0.58; blue-collar: OR = 0.55,95% CI = 0.37–0.82) and occupational (physically demanding: OR = 0.26,95% CI = 0.14–0.24; blue-collar: OR = 0.32,95% CI = 0.21–0.49) sitting time compared to those in physically undemanding and white-collar occupations respectively. Working more than 8 hours per day was inversely associated with high leisure-time sitting (OR = 0.44,95% CI = 0.29–0.68). No evidence for ‘compensation’ effects, where lower occupational sitting is compensated with higher leisure-time sitting, was found. Conclusions: Behaviour change interventions are needed to reduce sitting time as a means to prevent chronic disease. Workplace initiatives to reduce sitting time may be particularly important among individuals employed in white-collar and physical undemanding occupations, although other intervention strategies targeting leisure-time sitting are also required.

History

Volume

131

Start Page

1110

End Page

1118

Number of Pages

9

ISSN

1471-2458

Location

London, UK

Publisher

BioMed Central Ltd.

Language

en-aus

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • Yes

External Author Affiliations

Institute for Health and Social Science Research (IHSSR);

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

BMC public health.