File(s) not publicly available
Archetyping relationships with companion animals to understand disaster risk-taking propensity
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-14, 00:00 authored by J Trigg, Kirrilly Thompson, Bradley SmithBradley Smith, P Bennett© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Pets factor into the daily decision-making of many people. Importantly, various characteristics of these human–animal relationships are known to strongly influence pet owners’ risk behaviour and, consequently, their animals’ welfare during disasters. Yet, few studies have examined a range of such characteristics concurrently in order to describe risk propensity differences in these relationships. In this study, 437 Australian companion-animal (pet) owners reported human–animal relational, personality and attitudinal characteristics, to examine differences in stated tendency to act to secure their pet’s welfare whilst risking potential harm in a hypothetical disaster dilemma. Cluster analysis identified five archetypal profiles differing in relational, personality, attitude and risk-propensity characteristics, as well as in stated willingness to risk personal safety for the well-being of a pet. Results suggest that relational archetypes are an effective means of examining pet–owner risk propensity, to better understand owners’ risk-taking to protect their animals from harm during a disaster.
History
Start Page
1End Page
22Number of Pages
22eISSN
1466-4461ISSN
1366-9877Publisher
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)Publisher DOI
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
Acceptance Date
2017-10-31External Author Affiliations
La TrobeEra Eligible
- Yes
Journal
Journal of Risk ResearchUsage metrics
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC