CQUniversity
Browse

Analysing and interpreting outcomes data to support evidence-based practice using the example of AusTOMs-OT

journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-15, 00:00 authored by Carolyn Unsworth
Statement of context: Occupational therapists working with clients who have neurological impairments routinely collect outcomes data. However, data cannot inform practice unless it is routinely reviewed. The aim of this paper was to show how outcomes data collected on the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures – Occupational Therapy scale were analysed and interpreted. Although the example pertains to clients with neurological problems, the approach can be applied to all areas of practice. Critical reflection on practice: When outcomes data are routinely analysed and findings reviewed, occupational therapists have an increased understanding of practice strengths and limitations. Implications for practice: Incorporating analysis and interpretation of outcomes data for clients with neurological problems into practice contributes evidence to support therapy and ensures clinicians retain control of their data. © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.

History

Volume

80

Issue

10

Start Page

631

End Page

637

Number of Pages

7

eISSN

1477-6006

ISSN

0308-0226

Publisher

Sage Publications, UK

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2017-06-22

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC