Analysing and interpreting outcomes data to support evidence-based practice using the example of AusTOMs-OT
journal contribution
posted on 2018-05-15, 00:00 authored by Carolyn UnsworthStatement of context: Occupational therapists working with clients who have neurological impairments routinely collect outcomes data. However, data cannot inform practice unless it is routinely reviewed. The aim of this paper was to show how outcomes data collected on the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures – Occupational Therapy scale were analysed and interpreted. Although the example pertains to clients with neurological problems, the approach can be applied to all areas of practice. Critical reflection on practice: When outcomes data are routinely analysed and findings reviewed, occupational therapists have an increased understanding of practice strengths and limitations. Implications for practice: Incorporating analysis and interpretation of outcomes data for clients with neurological problems into practice contributes evidence to support therapy and ensures clinicians retain control of their data. © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
History
Volume
80Issue
10Start Page
631End Page
637Number of Pages
7eISSN
1477-6006ISSN
0308-0226Publisher
Sage Publications, UKPublisher DOI
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
Acceptance Date
2017-06-22Era Eligible
- Yes
Journal
British Journal of Occupational TherapyUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC