CQUniversity
Browse

Achilles tendon stress is more sensitive to subject-specific geometry than subject-specific material properties: A finite element analysis

journal contribution
posted on 2018-04-20, 00:00 authored by W Hansen, VB Shim, Steven ObstSteven Obst, DG Lloyd, R Newsham-West, RS Barrett
Abstract This study used subject-specific measures of three-dimensional (3D) free Achilles tendon geometry in conjunction with a finite element method to investigate the effect of variation in subject-specific geometry and subject-specific material properties on tendon stress during submaximal isometric loading. Achilles tendons of eight participants (Aged 25–35 years) were scanned with freehand 3D ultrasound at rest and during a 70% maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Ultrasound images were segmented, volume rendered and transformed into subject-specific 3D finite element meshes. The mean (±SD) lengths, volumes and cross-sectional areas of the tendons at rest were 62 ± 13 mm, 3617 ± 984 mm3 and 58 ± 11 mm2 respectively. The measured tendon strain at 70% MVIC was 5.9 ± 1.3%. Subject-specific material properties were obtained using an optimisation approach that minimised the difference between measured and modelled longitudinal free tendon strain. Generic geometry was represented by the average mesh and generic material properties were taken from the literature. Local stresses were subsequently computed for combinations of subject-specific and generic geometry and material properties. For a given geometry, changing from generic to subject-specific material properties had little effect on the stress distribution in the tendon. In contrast, changing from generic to subject-specific geometry had a 26-fold greater effect on tendon stress distribution. Overall, these findings indicate that the stress distribution experienced by the living free Achilles tendon of a young and healthy population during voluntary loading are more sensitive to variation in tendon geometry than variation in tendon material properties.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Volume

56

Start Page

26

End Page

31

Number of Pages

6

ISSN

0021-9290

Publisher

Elsevier

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

Acceptance Date

2017-02-26

External Author Affiliations

Griffith University; University of Auckland; Gold Coast Orthopaedics research and Education Alliance; University of Western Australia

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Journal

Journal of Biomechanics

Usage metrics

    CQUniversity

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC