Accurate respiratory rates count: So should you!
journal contribution
posted on 2018-04-18, 00:00 authored by Tracy FlenadyTracy Flenady, Trudy DwyerTrudy Dwyer, J Applegarth© 2016 College of Emergency Nursing Australasia It is well documented that the respiratory rate is the least accurately recorded vital sign. Despite nurses consistently confirming that they understand the physiological importance of the respiratory rate, more often than not, they estimate a value rather than count for an entire minute. Until recently, little has been known about why this phenomenon perpetuates. However, it has now been established that many emergency department registered nurses believe they are enhancing patients’ outcomes by performing tasks other than counting a patient's respiratory rate. This discussion highlights the significance of recording accurate respiratory rates, as opposed to estimating a rate; emphasizing that just four breaths either side of the normal range could be indicative of impending clinical deterioration.
History
Volume
20Issue
1Start Page
45End Page
47Number of Pages
3ISSN
1574-6267Publisher
ElsevierPublisher DOI
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
Era Eligible
- Yes
Journal
Australasian Emergency Nursing JournalUsage metrics
Categories
Keywords
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC