File(s) not publicly available
Abolishing the word-length effect
journal contribution
posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00 authored by C Hulme, A Surprenant, T Bireta, George StuartGeorge Stuart, I NeathThe authors report 2 experiments that compare the recall of long and short words in pure and mixed lists. In pure lists, long words were much more poorly remembered than short words. In mixed lists, this word-length effect was abolished and both the long and short words were recalled as well as short words in pure lists. These findings contradict current models that seek to explain the word-length effect in terms of item-based effects such as difficulty in assembling items, or in terms of list-based accounts of rehearsal speed. An alternative explanation, drawing on ideas of item complexity and item distinctiveness, is proposed.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Volume
30Issue
1Start Page
98End Page
106Number of Pages
9ISSN
0278-7393Location
WashingtonPublisher
American Psychological AssociationFull Text URL
Language
en-ausPeer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
External Author Affiliations
Not affiliated to a Research Institute; Purdue University; University of York;Era Eligible
- No