File(s) not publicly available
A review of pregnancy information on nutrition, physical activity and sleep websites
journal contribution
posted on 2020-02-18, 00:00 authored by Summer Cannon, Antonio LastellaAntonio Lastella, L Vincze, Corneel VandelanotteCorneel Vandelanotte, Melanie HaymanMelanie HaymanProblem: Most pregnant women report using the internet to source health information during pregnancy. However, little is known about the information presented on the internet and whether it is consistent with current evidence-based guidelines. Background: Pregnancy is considered a risk period for women as it is associated with poorer health behaviours including an inadequate diet, decreased physical activity and reduced sleep. As a result, pregnant women and their unborn child are at a greater risk of adverse health outcomes. Aim: The purpose of this study was to review pregnancy related information about nutrition, physical activity and sleep provided on Australian government and leading industry body websites, and to compare this information to current evidence-based guidelines. Methods: A systematic online search was conducted to identify Australian Government, and leading industry websites that provided information on nutrition, physical activity, or sleep during pregnancy. The content of each website was reviewed and compared against current nutrition, physical activity and sleep guidelines. Findings: 27 government and leading industry websites were included in this study. 18 websites included nutritional information, none of which aligned 100% with guidelines. Nine websites included physical activity information, only one of which was 100% in accordance with guidelines. Two websites included information on sleep during pregnancy, however neither were in accordance with guidelines. Conclusion: Women are accessing information via the internet that is not in accordance with current evidence-based guidelines. These results call to attention the need for government and leading industry websites to review and update their website information in accordance with current evidence-based guidelines. © 2018
History
Volume
33Issue
1Start Page
35End Page
40Number of Pages
6eISSN
1878-1799ISSN
1871-5192Publisher
Elsevier, NetherlandsPublisher DOI
Peer Reviewed
- Yes
Open Access
- No
Acceptance Date
2018-12-10External Author Affiliations
Griffith UniversityAuthor Research Institute
- Appleton Institute
Era Eligible
- Yes
Journal
Women and BirthUsage metrics
Categories
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC