As journalism programmes continue to grow, journalism research –
especially that which is practice-based – is declining. In Australia this
is recognised by fewer universities submitting research outputs to
the ‘Journalism and Professional Writing’ Field of Research Code,
and in the latest Excellence in Research for Australia evaluation,
no university scoring above 3 (‘at world standard’) out of 5 (‘well
above world standard’). For journalists transitioning from industry
to academy, it is becoming an issue that their professional
successes are largely unable to be translated into legitimate and
important research identities. One core issue underpinning the
arrested growth of journalism practice research is the approach to
preparing and assessing ethics applications. Often perceived at
odds with professional and personal codes of ethics, university
processes informed by the National Statement in Australia, and
other guidelines internationally, deter practitioner-researchers
from undertaking quality journalism. In this paper we discuss the
challenges of undertaking journalism as a mode of research,
suggesting it is entirely feasible to take advantage of the in-built
flexibilities of the National Statement. By doing this, not only can
journalist-researchers build distinctive research identities, but also
institutions can take advantage of the core fabric of journalism to
generate research with cultural, social and political impact.