posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00authored byDavid Oliver, Anthony Dobele, Myles Greber, Tim Roberts
This paper analyses the cognitive difficulty of six courses that may be taken as credit towards an IT degree offered by a regional Australian University. The assessment requirements of these six courses are evaluated using Bloom’s taxonomy and from this a difficulty metric, called here a Bloom Rating, is computed for each course. The analysis reveals that some quite lowly courses in terms of their ordering in the programme, such as first-year programming, are comparatively high in their cognitive demands, whereas some of the more advanced non-programming courses have relatively low levels of cognitive difficulty. An explanation for these trends is offered.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Start Page
227
End Page
231
Number of Pages
5
Start Date
2004-01-01
ISBN-10
1920682120
Location
Dunedin, NZ
Publisher
Australian Computer Society Inc.
Place of Publication
Sydney, NSW
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Conference; Faculty of Informatics and Communication;