CQUniversity
Browse
- No file added yet -

This course has a Bloom rating of 3.9

Download (305.47 kB)
conference contribution
posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00 authored by David Oliver, Anthony Dobele, Myles Greber, Tim Roberts
This paper analyses the cognitive difficulty of six courses that may be taken as credit towards an IT degree offered by a regional Australian University. The assessment requirements of these six courses are evaluated using Bloom’s taxonomy and from this a difficulty metric, called here a Bloom Rating, is computed for each course. The analysis reveals that some quite lowly courses in terms of their ordering in the programme, such as first-year programming, are comparatively high in their cognitive demands, whereas some of the more advanced non-programming courses have relatively low levels of cognitive difficulty. An explanation for these trends is offered.

Funding

Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)

History

Start Page

227

End Page

231

Number of Pages

5

Start Date

2004-01-01

ISBN-10

1920682120

Location

Dunedin, NZ

Publisher

Australian Computer Society Inc.

Place of Publication

Sydney, NSW

Peer Reviewed

  • Yes

Open Access

  • No

External Author Affiliations

Conference; Faculty of Informatics and Communication;

Era Eligible

  • Yes

Name of Conference

Australasian Computing Education Conference