posted on 2017-12-06, 00:00authored byAmoakoh Gyasi-Agyei
Abstract: Teaching a course without mathematical equations and formulas in a project-based learning (PBL) mode may not pose any threat to the content of the course, however, this may not be the case with Engineering courses that contain heavy mathematical analysis. Without proper novelty, students may engage the content superficially, while skipping all analytic content requiring critical thinking. This article discusses some practical issues related to the design and delivery of communications Engineering courses requiring intensive analytical thinking in a PBL mode. It also comments on how the course content has been reviewed based on students’ end-of-course evaluations.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Editor
Crebert G; Davies L; Phillips S
Start Page
1
End Page
10
Number of Pages
10
Start Date
2004-11-04
Finish Date
2004-11-05
ISBN-10
0909291969
Location
Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld.
Publisher
Griffith University
Place of Publication
Mt Gravatt, Qld.
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
Faculty of of Engineering and Physical Systems;
Era Eligible
No
Parent Title
Proceedings of the Effective Teaching and Learning conference (ELT 2004)