There is increasing interest in how the academy manages the transition of creative arts HDR candidates from apprentice to peer, but also concern about the processes, practices and policies associated with this area of research training. In a recent OLT-funded project we investigated policy expectations, expert and peer beliefs and expectations, and examiners’ practice, and canvassed the creative arts academic community for their recommendations on best practice in the examination of creative arts doctorates. This paper explores our findings, suggesting ways in which the national creative arts academy might address the (perceived) lack of standards in examination, and the (perceived) inequity within and between disciplines, while continuing to value differences and preserve the integrity of each art form.
Funding
Category 1 - Australian Competitive Grants (this includes ARC, NHMRC)
History
Start Page
36
End Page
60
Number of Pages
25
Start Date
2013-01-01
Finish Date
2013-01-01
ISBN-13
9781862957138
Location
Hobart, Tasmania
Publisher
University of Tasmania & Creative Arts Learning and Teaching Network (OLT)
Place of Publication
Hobart, Tasmania
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
TBA Research Institute; University of Canberra;
Era Eligible
Yes
Name of Conference
Creative Arts Learning and Teaching Network Symposium