Statutory adjudication has been enacted throughout Australia on a state-by-state basis. The original enacting legislation may be broadly divided into two models which have become known as the East Coast and West Coast models. The East Coast model adjudication scheme-which is operational in NSW, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, ACT and South Australia-has in recent times come under much criticism for failing to facilitate determinations of sufficient quality with respect to large and/or complex payment claims. By carrying out a thorough desktop study approach whereby evidence is garnered from three primary sources-government commissioned consultation papers, academic publications and judicial decisions-this paper reviews this criticism and there from distils the key factors influencing the quality of adjudication of large and/or complex claims in Australia.
History
Editor
Raiden AB; Aboagye-Nimo E
Parent Title
Proceedings of the 31st Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2015
Start Page
83
End Page
92
Number of Pages
10
Start Date
2015-09-07
Finish Date
2015-09-09
ISBN-13
9780955239090
Location
Lincoln, England
Publisher
Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Place of Publication
Reading, UK
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Open Access
No
External Author Affiliations
University of South Australia
Era Eligible
Yes
Name of Conference
31st Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM 2015) Conference